ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学内刊行物
  2. 東洋学園大学紀要
  3. 第3号

Society in the Self: Towards an Anthropology of Agency

https://togaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/452
https://togaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/452
b2085d55-c6a6-47a9-a3a2-aba34691bdbd
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-12-25
タイトル
タイトル Society in the Self: Towards an Anthropology of Agency
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
著者 マクベイ, ブライアン

× マクベイ, ブライアン

ja マクベイ, ブライアン

en McVeigh, Brian

Search repository

×

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Many have convincingly argued that the self, rather than an acultural, essentialist entity, is locally constituted from a matrix of age, class, gender, occupation, politics, and other variables. However, there still seems to be an implicit notion that willing, deciding, choosing, wishing ―― i.e., volitional acts ―― originate from an essentialist, asocial “executive ego.” I offer the question: is decision-making ability itself a social construct? If so, how is our sense of agency built by society? I propose that: (1) there are no essentialist, indissoluble selves; (2) society does not merely “influence” but builds selves; (3) as a social construction, selves were invented sometime in history; and (4) therefore it is possible to be a person without a self. I offer suggestions for how personal decision-making capabilities and volition are socially grounded in mental models of agency. In short, I discuss how overt, public power exchanges become covert, private intentions; how social relations construct psychological events; how “society is in the self.” I start my line of reasoning with three basic propositions, and then marshal evidence to support these statements and my main contention, which is that without a learned agency-model of some sort, we would not be persons with volition. I do not rely on data about culturally specific and local understandings of self, but rather, adopt a more extensive approach and assume that there are cross-cultural parameters that frame ―― though only in the most general way ―― mental models of self in all current societies. Then in order to delineate these cross-cultural parameters and to glean clues about how “society becomes subjectivity,” I examine two varieties of sociopsychological experience, namely spirit possession and hypnosis, that question our assumptions about agency.
書誌情報 東洋学園大学紀要
Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University

巻 3, p. 33-48, 発行日 1995-03-15
出版者
出版者 東洋学園大学
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09196110
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10421432
論文ID(NAID)
関連タイプ isIdenticalTo
識別子タイプ NAID
関連識別子 110000987750
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-18 10:31:26.219970
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3